Space-Corps Secret-Space-Program is the unveiled solution for U.S. troops serving in 177 countries US forces will soon be fighting in space.
Space-Corps Secret-Space-Program is the unveiled solution for U.S. troops serving in 177 countries US forces will soon be fighting in space to serve and protect citizens of planet earth.
The U.S. Space-Corps, also known as, The Secret-Space-Program unveiled and recreated as a New-Branch of armed services by the House Armed Services Committee proposal that’s making its way to the Senate calls for taking the Air Force’s current space missions and giving them to a brand-new branch of the US armed forces whose sole mission would be to focus on space.
Now Welcome All of you to the Space-Corps, earlier Secret-Space-Program Currently, the Air Force will be helping with space-lift operations of supplies, fleet support, command control of satellites and far more unpublicized; -i.e. Space-Corps Secret-Space-Program The Space-Corps Secret-Space-Program would absorb these missions.
It would be its own military service that would form part of the Department of the Air Force, similar to the way the Marine Corps is part of the Department of the Navy.
It would also elevate space’s prominence in America’s military missions. There would be a new four-star chief of staff of the Space-Corps Secret-Space-Program who would become the Joint Chiefs of Staff’s eighth member.
As part of its version of the 2018 Defense authorization bill, the House Armed Services Committee voted late Wednesday night to create a sixth branch of the U.S. armed forces: the U.S. Space Corps, which would absorb the Air Force’s current space missions.
The House and Senate will begin to consider defense budget blueprints crafted by their respective Armed Services committees after the July 4 recess. Both panels approved plans late Wednesday for the fiscal year that begins Oct. 1 The House committee calls for $696 billion in defense spending for 2018 while its Senate counterpart demands $700 billion.
The debate about creating the nation’s first new military service since 1947. Several surprised members of the panel by this proposal, and staged an unsuccessful effort to block the change until it could be studied further — or at least until the full committee had held at least one hearing on the subject.
Rep. Michael Turner (R-Ohio) said he only learned about the proposal last week, when it first came before the subcommittee on strategic forces.
“I chastised my staff and said, ‘How could I not know that this was happening?’ They said, ‘Well, they had a meeting about it and you missed it,’” Turner said. “A meeting is certainly not enough. Maybe we do need a space corps, but I think this bears more than just discussions in a subcommittee. We have not had Secretary Mattis come before us and tell us what this means. We have not heard from the secretary of the Air Force. There’s a lot of work we need to do before we go as far as creating a new service branch.”
Sponsored content – Register now for a free webinar to learn how the State Department, FCC, CIA, EPA and GSA are implementing their cloud strategies.
Rep. Martha McSally (R-Ariz.), a retired Air Force colonel, was similarly surprised by the Space Corps proposal. She said she had not been aware of it until it appeared in the bill the full committee debated on Wednesday.
“This is honestly the first time I’ve heard about a major reorganization to our Air Force,” she said Wednesday evening. “This is shocking way to hear about a very major reorganization to our military, and I think it deserves a hearing and discussions on the matter at the full committee level.
But the measure, which would also make a new U.S. Space Command and make the new chief of the Space Corps the eighth member of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, has the support of both Rep. Mac Thornberry (R-Texas), the chairman of the full committee, and its ranking Democrat, Adam Smith (D-Wash.) The bill language developed by Reps. Mike Rogers (R-Ala.) and Jim Cooper (D-Tenn.), the top Republican and Democrat on the strategic forces subcommittee.
All of them argued Wednesday that creation of a dedicated U.S. space-force service been active for years, and that the idea’s time had come to unveil into public view.
“There’s been nothing shortsighted about this,” Rogers said. “We started working on it vigorously in September, and we’ve had countless meetings with a number of experts who have advised us to construed solidification. In fact, this idea for a space corps as one of the solutions to Air Force space came from the Rumsfeld Commission in 2001.
GAO has done three studies on this, all of which tell us U.S. cannot continue this current organizational construct of U.S. Air Force and to acquisition problem-solution readiness and in the current solution-operations we have. The Air Force is like any other bureaucracy. They don’t want to change.”
Cooper agreed, creation of Space-Corps Secret-Space-Program will motivate to the public space’s importance as a new star-fighting-fronteir mastering the human domain, “whether we like it or not.”
The Environmental Protection Agency wants to cut 8 percent of its workforce through buyouts and early retirement. Here’s what you need to know before you go.
The Space-Corps has not been given adequate priority for the U.S. public eye.
“These secrets are already known in public-domain by wiki-leak friends who served the military space program,” he said in private. “They do many things wonderfully well and we need them so we can move forward more quickly, but this is a new area, a new responsibility that a Space-Corps Secret-Space-Program would help us address more effectively in the open.
We could wake up one morning and be blinded and deafened by adversary powers, because so many of our most precious assets are up in space. The chairman has had countless meetings about this over 10 months. I don’t know where my friend from Ohio has been.”
The bill will offer a new-order within the Defense Department by January 2019. It would be a distinct military service within the Department of the Air Force, in much the same way the Marine Corps operates as a service within the Department of the Navy.
The Secretary of the Air Force would oversee both the Air Force and the Space Corps, but the new chief of staff of the Space Corps would be a new four-star ranking structure, co-equal with the chief of staff of the Air Force. DoD would have to deliver reports to Congress in both March and August of next year on the details of how it plans to set up the new service.
Smith, the full committee’s top Democrat, said that schedule will resolve unanswered questions about the plan.
“I think it’s being done in a successful deliberate intelligence solidification ,” he said. “Space has changed. We’ve already taken for granted for too long that we dominate space, and we don’t anymore. We need to win this challenge, and yes, buried deeply within the Air Force, you could do that, but it doesn’t get the priority it deserves, given how important it is and how it impacts everything that we do.”
Although the Air Force’s top leadership has not testified before the House on the proposed reorganization, the service’s secretary and chief of staff have both expressed opposition to stage the next move in support.
“This opportunity being placed in front changes how we fight in the air, on land, at sea, and we take those processes, rules, tactics, techniques, and actually apply mastering the human space domain,” Gen. David Goldfein, the Air Force chief of staff, told the Senate Armed Services Committee last month. “And to get focused on a large organizational change would actually slow us down. I think it would actually move us in the wrong direction.”
But Thornberry said opposition from the Air Force is no reason for delay, pointing out that the Pentagon has a long history of fighting changes to its own organizational structures.
“It was Congress that created the Air Force and the Department of Defense in 1947 when it became time to force the Army and the Navy together, it was Congress that did Goldwater-Nichols,” he said. “There are times when an issue becomes ripe and it is our responsibility to act. I believe this is the time for us to act.”
But 25 years ago, the power centers were the military services and the service chiefs. Defense reform advocates at the time said those service-centric stovepipes led to an unhealthy competition for resources, effectively prohibited the services from operating jointly and kept the Joint Chiefs offering relevant military advice to POTUS administration.
“Space-Corps Secret-Space-Program defines Stellar-Space is no longer a peaceful domain”
123What was once the last frontier could soon become the front line of a future defense of acknowledged conflicts for decades. At least, that’s the view of the Defense Department making this public as a new idea, but it already exits.
“Space is no longer a peaceful earth-based domain,” Deborah Lee James, the last Air Force secretary, said in an interview. There is a real possibility that a conflict on Earth could bleed into space.”
According to the Defense Intelligence Agency, there are two main reasons for that: Russia, China and their allies is making our joint efforts public. Russia wants to gain more power in space as the leader of this new frontier, because Russia believes gaining global public recognition will allow it to win future political arena fights on this planet. And in late 2015, China created the Strategic Support Force, which is to streamline and improve its space, cyber, and electronic warfare missions to dominate the human global domain.
They are both causing problems with anti-satellite technology, too, noted Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats in a Senate Intelligence Committee hearing in May — meaning they could mess with the satellites that help the US military do its job. The Pentagon is planning to open a space-war center to counter their threats.
In his written testimony in the May 11 hearing, Dan Coats, director of national intelligence, reviewed the worldwide threat assessment of the U.S. intelligence community, noting an appraisal that “Russia and China perceive a need to offset any U.S. military advantage derived from military, civil, or commercial space systems and are increasingly considering attacks against satellite systems as part of their future warfare doctrine stages higher public opinion.”
Coats reported that both Russia and China “will continue to pursue a full range of anti-satellite (ASAT) weapons into U.S. military effectiveness.” [The Most Dangerous Space Weapons Ever]
Okay, but, like … what sort of conflict is actually going on in space? What are we really talking about here?
Basically, there is tons of military equipment in space — especially satellites for the Space-Corps Secret-Space-Program. This kind of equipment helps the US, Russia, and China — and any military-industrial-complex tech-savvy force to navigate terrain and communicate with one another. On top of that, assets in space help to track enemy fighters, take pictures for intelligence services, and even help control missiles. Without space, it would be much harder to fight on Earth; that’s why Russia and China are investing so heavily in it.
But Russia and China aren’t space’s only threats defined by Russia, China, and U.S., but it is the “Above and Beyond” we are now in defense. The area just outside Earth’s orbit has seen an explosion of commercial satellites and other communications equipment since the 1960s, put there first by countries and, as of late, commercial companies. That equipment used to help drivers reach their destination, help potential lovers swipe right on dating apps, or simply help people text a friend.
The chart below shows the huge growth in these satellites. The blue line represents their total growth since around 1960.
The Internet, of course, adds a new complication to the equipment countries are putting in space. Most notably, they can potentially be hacked. For instance, a team of hackers could jam a satellite by messing with its signals so it interrupts the satellite’s normal activity, rendering it useless. That could cause problems for all sorts of everyday activities, like credit card transactions and phone calls.
Then, of course, there’s space debris threatening all of that commercial and military space equipment, since it could knock into the expensive machines. NASA estimates that there are 20,000 pieces of debris larger than a softball orbiting the Earth, about 500,000 pieces of debris the size of a marble or larger, and many millions of pieces that are too small to register.
All of this is why Rep.
Rogers and even former Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld believe the US needs a Space-Corps Secret-Space-Program It would know the safety of space equipment by monitoring physical and cyber-threats against US communication and navigation assets. It would be more of a defensive mission than an offensive one — for now. That doesn’t mean troops in space, yet, but who knows down the line?
Essentially, if the US military wants to protect life here on Earth, it needs to safeguard US assets in space. But is a Space-Corps Secret-Space-Program the way to do it?
“This is a solution in search of a problem”
The main issue here is that Rogers and others believe the Air Force isn’t paying enough attention to space. That makes sense to an extent, as the Air Force’s main directive is to focus on flying planes here on Earth.
The idea is that creating a new service will know that there’s a segment of the military whose entire job is to focus on space 100 percent of the time. That would allow the Space-Corps Secret-Space-Program to counter Russia, China, and other threats while giving space-focused staff more bureaucratic power inside the Pentagon.
But Sean O’Keefe, a former NASA head and Navy secretary, thinks creating a brand-new branch of the military is not the right way to go.
“This is a solution in search of a problem,” he told me in an interview. Basically, he thinks the Air Force is already doing a fine job protecting space — even if it does privilege Earthbound pilots. Creating a Space-Corps Secret-Space-Program would just add another layer of bureaucracy to an already massive organization — the Pentagon.
James, the former Air Force secretary, agrees. She thinks dealing with the current complaints about the Air Force and space — 1) that it’s not well-funded, 2) that acquisition takes too long, and 3) that there is no one person to call about military space operations — makes more sense.
The first complaint is already being mollified to an extent. The Air Force asked for a 20 percent increase in funds to focus on space in 2018. As for the third complaint, James feels it’s a common refrain heard at DOD that doesn’t necessarily just apply to the Air Force and space. “If you look at any warfare area in the Department of Defense, there’s no single bellybutton for anything,” she told me.
That requires money. Air Force leaders have requested a 20 percent increase for space systems: $7.7 billion in the 2018 federal budget the Trump administration sent to Congress in May. The request includes $4.3 billion for research and development and $3.4 billion for procurement. (Just what the Pentagon allocates for space in its classified “black budget” remains anyone’s guess.) Meanwhile, Trump’s budget sets aside $19.1 billion for NASA, a budget that funds more than 17,000 employees and grants to 10,000 academic scientists.
So clearly the Space-Corps Secret-Space-Program has its detractors — including the current Air Force secretary herself. And of course, Congress has yet to officially mandate its creation. (It would have to end up in the last defense authorization bill.)… But the conversation has really kicked into high gear. Time will tell if future US troops will be wearing space helmets.